In court it was a case of road accident with participation of the car land Rover (under the control of a certain Moverly Natalia yulievna) and cows.
This lady has written claim for compensation for material damage to the external Manager of the poultry farm, which is the owner of the herd.
Answer lady worthy of the highest praise of legal and literary prize!!!
The external Manager
Mailing address: 129281,
Phone: 111-11-11, 222-22-22,
Ex. No. 257, dated June 26, 2017
The owner of the land Rover lady MAVERIK N. Yu
Dear Natalia Yulevna!
With interest has read Your application and attached documents. Would be willing to apologize for the accident, which was my own fault, but will refrain from doing so, since no guilt is not felt.
Moreover, it is possible that You owned a vehicle, which is a source of danger, used as the weapon the killing of innocent cows (glad that it happened not in India, where the cow is a sacred animal).
From the materials You sent, it does not follow that the fault was mine,that is a cow, acting on my direct instruction, was martyred with the aim of causing You major damage to property.
I wasn’t even familiar with the untimely deceased, therefore, to give instructions to her could not. In my opinion, a more logical explanation is different: the driver, not observing the speed limit and not guided by any common sense or driving experience, no rules of the road, did not take the proper precautions and did everything in his power to avoid road accidents.
Typically, drivers reduce speed, distance, sight at a roadside grazing cattle (especially if it is a big and Horny). Because the explanations of the driver and the cow in the materials are not available, it’s hard to believe that a cow, disguised in a roadside Bush, calmly waited in ambush approaching You owned the car, and jumped out on the road at the last moment.
Ready to submit to court the documents confirming that the deceased did not receive special training, and generally characterized as good-natured, slow and gentle creature. Inclinations to suicide or terrorism is not mentioned, personal aversions to cars land-Rover wasn’t seen. In life behaved correctly.
In performance-Martyr were some shortcomings, but You know about the dead or good, or no.
Thus, by its freely undertaken without fault and compensation caused You (the driver?) damage, as You know, I’ll refrain.
Please do not treat this as a rejection of the voluntary execution of obligations within the specified period, since the existence of the obligation and ten days are errors Your lawyers, further costs which may not be appropriate. The address to the external Manager has said any competent lawyer that the property claims against the debtor are not under civil or other proceedings and in accordance with the Federal law on insolvency (bankruptcy). Once You make a claim in accordance with this Law, they are considered by Law (and not You) time.
Further to inform that since neither my nor cow guilt is not proven, I investigated the issue of bringing to responsibility (civil, administrative) the true culprit, which caused the death of the favourite of the whole farm. And compensation for damages and moral harm caused to the collective dairy farm our poultry, as well as the families and friends of the deceased.
Your suggestions for voluntary compensation or on compensation will be discussed with the understanding (even after day period).
With respect and gratitude for the Delivered reading Your mail and responding pleasure external control N. G. Taimanov