© RIA Novosti / Irina KalashnikovaIn the 1920-1921 years, that is long hours, in severe haze, at the dawn of Soviet power Vladimir Mayakovsky wrote the poem “About rubbish”, which described the life of the representatives of the Soviet government in the idyllic vein.More shots rang out civil war, the Volga famine, the country’s hyperinflation — “I Flies in the buffet, not a penny no money exchanged ten million,” and comrade Nadia and her husband is overborne exactly Philemon and Baucis. Nadia is practicing the piano, husband drinking tea from a samovar, “On the “news” lying, kitty warm, and from under PocoLoco squeal rabid camareira”. The husband and Nadia is a dream. Husband about how he will celebrate his increase in salary, the vast breeches, about Nadia dress with revolutionary emblems to figurate on the ball at the revolutionary military Council.What causes outrage in the portrait of Karl Marx:”Marx and the walls looked and looked…And drogasil mouth,and how zaoret:”Entangled revolution philistinism thread.Worse Wrangel narrow-minded way of life.Scoregolf Canaries roll —that communitygenerated was not broken!”
Trump at the UN has criticized communism and socialism
This reaction is the founder of clear. We are also somewhat differently imagined life of heroic Komsomol of 20th years. Amid extraordinary national disasters would behave and modest. Especially since in subsequent years the winners of Wrangel drank the Cup full of life and loved the red tree all headsets. Some were then dusted himself down into the pit, but the other continued to love. Yes, and Mayakovsky in 1928, bought in Paris not even a Canary and not a dress with the emblems, and a Renault car, following the instructions of comrade Lily: “About the car do not forget: 1) fuses front and back 2) extra spotlight side 3) electrical proximalto for the front glass 4) lights in the back with the inscription “stop”, 5) mandatory arrows showing where the car turns, 6) warm poponku to cold water, 7) don’t forget the suitcase and two additional rear wheels”. But it was like 600-th “Mercedes” in 1992. won’t have to ask, where did friend Nadia and her husband in 1920 took the apartment with a piano. They have always lived there, from the time of Nicholas II? Or possessed by requisition? Question and hitherto frequently encountered in connection with the undertaking “Last known address”.However, to blame the revolutionary ruling class? People like people, eager for the Cup of life. If the post-Soviet ruling class is much better.The main thing that Marx and screaming, and belting out Mayakovsky had something else in mind. Craving for household arrangement, the symbol of which was the Canary, and the desire for the revolutionary transformation of the world — the two are incompatible. “No man can serve two masters”.
18 APR, 08:00Слон invisible, or unseen world revolution and this applies not only to the item and even, perhaps, not so much to the nomenclature. Ordinary Soviet people lived in the hardest conditions. Civil war, destruction, great change, destruction, exposing the enemies of the people, the war against Hitler, the devastation. In the sense of everyday it was like to settle on the slope of the volcano. That somehow established and arranged, but then the new cataclysm, and once again I have to start my life and settle again. Starting from the simplest household utensils.And the generation of our grandfathers, great-grandfathers (and grandmothers, great-grandmothers) with ant-like tenacity again and again rebuilt home life. Unpretentious, but at least some.On the one hand, official ideology called it philistinism and even in General was right. The motto of the bourgeois “small but mine” is not quite advanced teaching. On the other — without this ant-like persistence where subjects were themselves advanced ideology. The more that they themselves were kicked out of the same mug tradesman, only on a more solid financial base.But the most significant that the thrust of the sustainability of life — this is the love to the native ashes, love to fatherlike coffins. Where commanded from the beginning by the will of God samostoyaniya man, the pledge of its greatness.The end of the progressive ideology was seen as the triumph of philistinism. No more annoying restrictions, communism Canaries were beaten, and you can live like in Europe the “Virtuous Vater, obedient family on the roof the stork, before the house of flowers”. Cottage, apartment, car, etc. Not everyone, of course, but perseverance overcomes all.However, it turned out that the end of one progressive ideology means only the emergence of a new, even more advanced. When in the advanced countries, it became evident that houses with flowers all is not enough, the ideologues of globalism have declared that it is not necessary, because it is nonsense, put into the archive.People of the global future must be a hipster nomad, who never has anything of his own, except that the underclothes of linen. Everything else — housing, vehicles, household utensils — new nomad needs to rent, not to have to get used to it. The more the heart become attached. Floor permanent nomad too, should not have. Accordingly, God, country, family, too, appeal to absurdity.Only atomized nomad, living in the same atomized.
Human universe as a dance of atoms, nothing more.And nomad can consume — perhaps even consume copiously, but he couldn’t possess, he should not be anything essential. And all this is presented not as utopiya imagination, and how thorough foresight (predictions) and handsome (according to the ideologues).But hence the anger of progressive people to the whole stable, solid, traditional: “most Canaries heads turn to globalism Canaries had not been beaten”. Last time failed, and even turned out quite the opposite. Today again the Canaries in the way.Maxim Sokolov