USA stocking terrorists

США запасаются террористами

From the Turkish operation in Syria ended almost without bloodshed, won almost everything. Turkey has blocked support for possible military action their part the Kurds. Syria regained control over the border area. United States of America withdrew troops from there, where losses are not recouped. The Russian Federation gained fame as a political winner. But!

The Kurdish militia for a few days threw troops against the Turkish forces guarding the camps of captured fighters universally banned terrorist group calling itself the “Islamic state”. A few hundred (or even thousand) Islamist militants have left the prison and went in unknown directions. In addition, SGA, departing from the region have taken a significant part igilovskih commanders and almost all the militants of Uighur descent.

Openly remind: if SGA ran is obviously where to burn easier. The Uighurs — a Turkic Muslim people who inhabit the neighboring Kazakhstan mountainous area in China. Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous region — for decades a source of serious headache obschekitayskom power. It is a very strong desire to secede from China, and radicalization under Islamist slogans. Openly predict: the Uighurs with the experience of terror and the fighting will soon be at home. Then China will have to spend much more effort on saving in Xinjiang at least a minimum of order. And dramatically weaken his position in the economic and political confrontation with the SGA. For the same of SGA and Britain were set on fire in Hong Kong. It is clear, the next blow — the lands bordering our allies.

Openly ask: where are declared exported SGA under the guise of fighting terrorists elsewhere? For example, moved to the middle East at the beginning of the “Arab spring” fighters of Khattab and Basayev? Where the Crimean Tatar radicals, which in LIH whole battalion? Recently, Ukrainian journalists found some of them in Kiev. Live openly, have citizenship. Speak on TV and at competitions. Why do the Americans moved them closer to us — do I need to explain?Anatoly Wasserman

Share Button